Cabin & Comfort
Closely matched on the cabin equipment compared.

Before you compare
S FWD vs LX, compared on verified specifications and price.
The S FWD starts about $1,000 less than the LX.
Because these two trims sit at different points in their lineups, the category winners below reflect trim level as much as brand. Read them as evidence, and weigh them against the equipment you will actually use.
At a glance
For shoppers on this Seltos site, the Seltos S FWD is our pick over the Niro LX.
Seltos S FWD starts at $26,390 vs $27,390.
No verified horsepower figures to compare.
Niro LX returns 53 mpg combined vs 30 mpg.
Head to head
The verified differences most likely to decide it — each shown side by side, with the winner called out.
Closely matched on the cabin equipment compared.
The Niro LX delivers lower fuel costs and fewer stops at the pump.
The Seltos S FWD lowers your cost of entry with a lower starting price.
Closely matched: 64.2 cu ft vs 63.7 cu ft.
The S FWD starts about $1,000 less than the LX.
On verified numbers, the S FWD leads in starting price; the LX leads in combined mpg. What the numbers actually mean for you here: the LX's combined mpg edge (53 vs 30 mpg) means fewer stops at the pump and lower running costs over years of ownership.
When it matters most: if your commute is long, the LX's combined mpg edge (53 vs 30 mpg) is worth weighting heavily.
Visual comparison


Seltos S FWD
Feature details coming soon.
Niro LX

Seltos S FWD








Niro LX





The bottom line
Seltos S FWD
For shoppers on this Seltos site, the Seltos S FWD is our pick over the Niro LX.
What could change this: If better fuel economy and lower running costs matters most, the Niro LX is the better fit.
On verified numbers, the S FWD leads in starting price; the LX leads in combined mpg.
The full picture
By the numbers
These are the figures most shoppers weigh first — price, power, efficiency, and room — with the full specification table below.
| Specification | Seltos S FWD | Niro LX |
|---|---|---|
| Starting MSRP | $26,390 | $27,390 |
| Horsepower | 147 hp | 139 hp (SAE net, as published) |
| Torque | 132 lb-ft | 195 lb-ft (SAE net, as published) |
| Combined MPG | 30 mpg | 53 mpg |
| City MPG | 28 mpg | 53 mpg |
| Highway MPG | 33 mpg | 54 mpg |
| Max cargo — behind 1st row, seats folded | 64.2 cu ft | 63.7 cu ft |
| Seating | 5 | 5 |
| Drivetrain | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Intelligent Variable (IVT) | 6-Speed Dual-Clutch Automatic |
Make the call
Best for:
Best for:
Good to know
The questions shoppers ask most when weighing these two — answered with the verified facts.
Value comes down to the details. The S FWD starts about $1,000 less than the LX. Weigh the standard equipment each includes, their fuel economy, and the features you'll genuinely use. Cross-shop comparably equipped trims and let local incentives settle it.
"Nicer every day" is about the things you touch on every drive — the seats, the controls, and the screen. Comfort is personal, though: seat shape, driving position, and how intuitive the controls feel to you matter more than any feature list. Spend ten minutes in each on a route like your real commute — that test drive will tell you more about daily livability than any spec comparison.
Yes — a few things worth knowing before you decide. The Niro LX brings stronger fuel economy that the Seltos S FWD doesn't match in this pairing. None of these automatically make it the better car for you, but if any one lines up with how you drive, it's a genuine reason to give the LX a serious look. Weigh those advantages against where the S FWD leads — and the verdict above — rather than treating any single feature as the whole decision.
High annual mileage puts the spotlight on running costs, and that's mostly about fuel. Here, the Niro LX returns the better EPA-estimated economy (53 mpg combined) — over 15,000 miles a year that adds up to noticeably fewer fill-ups and real money saved versus the alternative. Beyond fuel, a high-mileage driver should weigh seat comfort for all those hours and each model's reliability record — worth checking current ratings for the specific trims, since it matters most when you're piling on miles. If your year is mostly highway commuting, lean toward the more efficient, more comfortable choice; the small differences compound over 15,000 miles in a way they wouldn't for a light-use second car.
Interior preference is partly personal — dashboard layout, seat shape, and where the controls fall all factor in — so the best test is to sit in both. If a richer, more feature-laden cabin matters to you, compare the specific trims' option packages directly; if you mainly want a comfortable, sensibly-arranged space, either will serve you well day to day.
For most shoppers, the right pick follows your priorities rather than a single score. If running costs lead, the Niro LX's efficiency is the draw. Use the verdict above as the starting recommendation, then confirm it with a back-to-back test drive of the exact trims you're considering.
Find local inventory, pricing, incentives, and available trims near you.
Updated inventory from local dealers.